On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi, > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Richard Quadling <rquadl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 15 May 2011 21:37, <nore...@php.net> wrote: > >> > >> This is an automatic mail from the rmtoool's build bots. > >> > >> New build errors have been introduced between > >> and 311062. > >> > >> The errors are: > >> > >> php-5.4, build ts-windows-vc9-x86: > >> , NMAKE, error, U1077, '"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio > 9.0\VC\BIN\cl.exe"' : return code '0x2', > >> > >> > >> > >> Full logs are available at (htmlized versions too): > >> > >> http://windows.php.net/downloads/snaps/php-5.4/r311062 > > > > With 3,475 warnings in the Win32 x86 VC9 nts build, how do you see the > > wood for the trees? > > > If the warnings can be ignored, why not suppress them? > > Ideally almost all could be suppressed. However there are many false > positive or cases that can't happen (theoretically). Keeping in mind > that this log is the static analyzer logs. Once I got the new machines > running, both normal and analyzers log will be published. > > The key then is to detect the delta between two revisions (should be > up soon) and then fix those already. > > That being said, a warning php has been a sweet from many of us but > some devs simply do not want that ;-). > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > I would guess, that "That being said, a warning php has been a sweet from many of us but some devs simply do not want that ;-)." should be "That being said, a warning-free php has been a sweet dream for many of us but some devs simply do not want that ;-)." sorry, maybe the problem is on my end, but couldn't decode tha without fuzzing :) Tyrael
