Am 25.04.2011 09:52, schrieb Alessandro Nadalin: >> Nothing wrong with it. >> >> The E_STRICT is raised because when you call a non-static method >> statically, $this will not be defined and that could be a problem (e.g. >> the method could rely on it). When you call a static method with ->, it >> remains a static call, $this will not be defined anyway, and there is >> absolutely no problem with it. > > I can see your point, but I think we should drop this "feature" not to > let developers have N ways of doing the same things:
why should ANYTHING be dropped affection backward compatibility? > if you declare a method as static, you should be able to only call it > with a static call, not hrough an object. that is a opinion, but not enough to damage BC > PHP usually lets you do the same thing in a few ways, and that's a bit > frustrating there are so naby different woman and cars out there and that's a bit frustrating - you know what i mean? > because we should force some kind of best practices for > the language: not .advise, but *force* maybe you are using the wrong language if this is your opinion? nobody says "stop selling guns because somebody can shoot in his foot"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
