hi, Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs?
ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. 2011/4/23 Johannes Schlüter <johan...@schlueters.de>: > Hi, > > we have quite a few SAPIs where I expect that nobody looked at them for > years. Anybody objects from dropping them from trunk? This brings less stuff > to document and less confusion for users. > > I suggest dropping: > > aolserver > caudium > continuity > milter > phttpd > pi3web > roxen > thttpd > tux > webjames > > I'm not sure about: > > apache_hooks > apache2filter > isapi (is FastCGI now preferred on Win?) > > That leaves: > > apache > apache2handler > cgi > cli > embed > fpm > litespeed > nsapi > > johannes > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
