On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Alain Williams <a...@phcomp.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 04:55:00PM +0200, Mark wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This proposal is for the often called line like this: > > $var = isset($_GET['var']) ? $_GET['var'] : ''; > > > > Only a shorter and imho a cleaner solution to get the same: > > $var = varset($_GET['var']); > > It should be called var_set() - better on name space pollution. > oke > > However there is a slight issue with this approach. If notices are > turned on > > this code will generate a notice while i think it should not do that. But > > perhaps this approach is "to short". > > A slightly different implementation (and longer) prevents the notice: > > If is is a language element (like isset()) then you can avoid this problem. > Could you explain that a bit more? > I do find a lot of code, in simple scripts, that does just that. > > It might be nice to extend it such that if the 1st argument is a list then > the > first in the list which is set is returned, eg: > > $var = var_set(($_GET['var'], $_POST['var']), 'default'); > > I might be missing the point here, but the way i understand it that can give unexpected results.. since it returns the first element from an array in your suggestion but that's not what you want to do. > -- > Alain Williams > Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT > Lecturer. > +44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/ > Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: > http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php > #include <std_disclaimer.h> >
