On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 13:37, Ondřej Surý <ond...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011, Derick wrote: > > > >> I know it doesn't; I was asking for making it detectable. Perhaps > >> instead of LFS, you could use DEBIAN as "ZEND_BUILD_EXTRA" > >> instead then? Or perhaps include flags with that, that show all the > >> different Debian flags/options/or perhaps a debian specific version nr > >> as well; such as DEBIAN1, DEBIAN2 etc... > > > > Seems reasonable to me, but I am not sure if we don't break other > > stuff by introducing this. But right now it's a right time to do it, > > since the new development cycle has just started. > > I have tested your patch, but since this changes the ability to load > existing modules, there's a need to plan a transition and coordinate > it with the release team. It would probably also be good thing to > coordinate this either with other major distributions (so the LFS flag > is same everywhere) or move this logic directly to PHP upstream.
Yes, that makes sense. > What do you (and other pkg-php maintainers) think? My guess would be > that best solution would be to move this to upstream, so it's > consistent even for local custom builds with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64. I think this makes sense to me. Adding LFS to out ZEND_BUILDIN_EXTRA stuff alongside with the ZTS and DEBUG flags makes a lot of sense. I am cc-ing php internals here. As a reference, this is the issue: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612743 regards, Derick -- http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
