On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are a lot of values to disable POST completely. That's also why > thinking the option you are proposing while keeping in mind the whole > picture makes sense. > > There are different existing modes and one or two new modes (to be > introduced, like disabling POST). Having a clean way to choose which > mode should be used for a request makes sense and will improve the > user experience. Right now and as shown the confusing discussions on > IRC (or partially here) shows that the current situation is a mess. > > Again, I'm not saying that the idea behind this patch is bad, only > that there is a better way to do it while being less confusing and > making the whole thing cleaner to define. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy>If you think that there is a better alternative, please write an RFC and or a patch, but I don't think that we should give up a good idea which has support and patch for a vague idea, which is maybe better, but nobody going to put effort in it to write RFC, write the patch, etc. but that is my 2 cents of course. Tyrael
