On Sun Dec 12 04:33 PM, Nathan Nobbe wrote: > > > So the 'with/within' tokens would apply to traits. > > I feel 'expect', 'need', 'require' etc sound better, matter of opinion > really, but it sounds like from an internals perspective it's > preferred to reuse existing keywords if possible. >
Well my opinion is more of linguistics, given the definitions: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/trait http://www.thefreedictionary.com/use http://www.thefreedictionary.com/with Using 'with/within' keywords for a trait seem more natural and intuitive (at least as an English speaker). I can understand re-using existing keywords and why 'use' was ok but adding a 'require' for traits just feels awkward (saying you can 'require' code or an interface for a trait). I know someone's bound to say "you'll get used to it", fair enough. I'll add that Scala also uses 'with' for traits, so it's worth considering. > > If you see the value in the abstract keyword in abstract classes or > moreover interfaces in general, I'd consider the value of this feature > equal. Of course not everyone uses abstract classes or interfaces :D > I agree with what you're saying, a little hesitant to say of equal value since a lot of research has went into 'abstract' or 'interface' :) -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
