On Nov 24 11:02:45, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > >Given the semantics of PHP arguments, there is "nothing wrong" with > >defining a required argument after an optional one, and in some cases > >it is required. Consider: > > I think there's something wrong with it, primarily - the fact that > it doesn't really make any sense. The object/null thing is a kludge. > Unfortunately, I don't see a proper way to handle this without named > arguments.
Sure, it's hackish as hell, but that's PHP's fault, not the user using it. My point is that we shouldn't add new E_STRICTs for something with no possible alternatives. > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 -- Etienne Kneuss http://www.colder.ch -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
