hi, hi, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Zeev Suraski wrote: > >> > To me this alpha would be a "this is what we're mostly likely going >> > to have thing". I wouldn't like to see new major features, engine >> > rework being done; but I also think we shouldn't try to remove stuff >> > from it unless really necessary. >> >> If that's the case, count me in those who oppose the release of the current >> codebase as an alpha. > > I find it interesting that apparently so many people don't want a new > PHP version out, but forget to say what they think needs fixing. Instead > of opposing, can we not do just some work?
I do want a new PHP release. I do want a clear, transparent, honest process to decide which features get in, to select the release managers and to get the release out. It also happens that I do some work as well. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
