On Nov 16, 2010, at 13:27 , Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Chad Fulton <chadful...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I understand where you're coming from, and I appreciate the effort >> you've put into this RFC so far, but what I meant is that (although I >> don't have karma and won't be voting), *if* I were to vote, I would >> only +1 annotations if they were extremely limited (key=>value pairs). >> > > if that what you want, you should vote +1 for the annotations, or open a new > vote for extending the reflection api to allow getting invidual docblock > tags
I am a low man on this totem pole, and have no karma at all, but I have to say that makes a great deal of sense to me. Right now, for documenting a codebase, I parse the docblocks in userland to extract @tags. Adding that capability to the Reflection classes sounds quite valuable. -- Paul M. Jones http://paul-m-jones.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
