On 28 September 2010 08:19, Michael Wallner <m...@php.net> wrote: > On 09/28/2010 07:05 AM, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> 2010/9/27 Johannes Schlüter<johan...@schlueters.de>: >>> >>> I think Mike's point was that these functions, according to the comment, >>> only exist for BC reasons. So they should either keep BC or be dropped. >>> > > Exactly. > >> The only usage php_idate() exists for is the idate() function, i >> greped pecl and tried to use OpenGrok, but it was only used within the >> date extension, so i think the break is minor to nothing. > > So? Drop it or leave it alone :) idate() seems as useful as a nipple on my > back...
I use idate(), to this day, in preference of (int) date(). Whilst it's hardly a huge issue, dare I say many folks don't even know if its existence, if it is dropped, I may cross whomever does it off of my Christmas card list. > > Mike > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
