On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Raphael Geissert <geiss...@php.net> wrote: > Pierre Joye wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Raphael Geissert <geiss...@php.net> >> wrote: >>> As it seems, the best and maintainable solution is to switch to some >>> other alternative library (sadly, there's no such candidate atm.) >> >> What make you think that c-client is dead? I have seen updates last >> year and I know that the main developer still works and support this >> library. I don't think either that using 6 years old discussions to >> decide something is a good idea. > > Tomas already clarified that point.
There is nothing clarified here. Yes, the c-client is closed to death but I don't see anything close to it out there, from a C/C++ point of view (with a usable license, there are some good libs under gpl, sadly). And yes, there are very good user land implementation out there as well. Does it mean that we should give up on having imap support in core? I don't think so :). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
