On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Pierre Joye wrote: > 2010/6/28 Johannes Schlüter <johan...@schlueters.de>: > > > > On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 22:05 +0000, Felipe Pena wrote: > >> > >> Log: > >> - Fixed bug #51421 (Abstract __construct constructor argument > >> list not enforced) > >> > >> Bug: http://bugs.php.net/51421 (Closed) Abstract __construct > >> constructor argument list not enforced > > > > Won't this break compatibility? > > > > I'd say the change is logically correct but not sure we should break BC > > there during RC. > > Did we not discuss this problem recently? If I'm not mistaken the > decision was to do not change the way constructors work in 5.x.
That's what I seem to remember as well. Derick -- http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php