On 06/21/2010 04:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > As a PHP user, when moving to PHP 5.3, from 5.2 I had the question > regarding which accel to use (I had been using APC). From most > of what I read, APC was not compatible and looking at the APC site, > the last 'stable' release was ~2years ago with a bunch of betas. I > then looked at XCache and saw that it was "more maintained" as well > as explicitly mentioned PHP 5.3 compatibility. > > In other words, to the unwashed masses, XCache, for example, > seemed a "better" and "safer" choice than APC, despite the > list of names attached to the latter.
We've been experiencing some troubles with APC + 5.3, too, so I tried switching to XCache and my experience is described here: http://xcache.lighttpd.net/ticket/240 Judging by XCache SVN, there were no changes since then. So we're still using APC + 5.3 in production, even though I get a core now and then (weird, last segfault was ~2 weeks ago..). -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal --- http://pinba.org - realtime statistics for PHP -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
