thank you, btw. I don't know how did that happen, I copypasted from my previous post, which has $var++ in it :)
Tyrael On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Julien Pauli <jpa...@php.net> wrote: > Well at least I fixed the splweaktypehintingwithautoboxing for the function > to return ++$var instead of $var++ which couldn't make it ;-) > > Julien > > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <i...@tyrael.hu> wrote: > >> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith <m...@pooteeweet.org >> >wrote: >> >> > >> > On 28.05.2010, at 11:50, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > On 28.05.2010, at 11:22, Etienne Kneuss wrote: >> > > >> > >> so, it would be nice to update the RFC(s), so that we have a solid >> > >> ground on which we can discuss/vote. >> > > >> > > >> > > i agree. i currently see 5 fundamental different options on the table: >> > > >> > > 1) current trunk >> > > 2) current trunk but only with scalar/numeric type support >> > > 3) weak typing with current PHP conversion rules that raise an >> E_STRICT >> > on data loss >> > > 4) weak typing with new conversion rules >> > > 5) some syntax to allow both one of 1)/2) and 3)/4)/5) >> > > >> > > i can take care of 3), 4) and 5) over the weekend, though for 4b) (see >> > below) i would like to get some feedback from others >> > > >> > > other than that i agree that we have beat this horse long enough that >> we >> > can then pretty quickly move to a vote. that being said, i think we >> should >> > do the vote by allowing people to then sort the RFC's in order of >> preference >> > with the option of leaving options out that they want to veto. >> > > >> > > of course if 6) gets voted for we would then have to decide on which >> of >> > the permutations (1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 2/3, 2/4, 2/5) to go with in a second >> vote. >> > >> > >> > ok .. i adjusted the weak type hinting RFC to cover 3) and 4). >> > so i guess it would be nice if someone could create and RFC for 2) (as I >> > guess the strict typing RFC covers 1)?) and if someone believes in a >> > combined approach (Derick?) create an RFC for 5). >> > if someone wants to do an SPL based exception approach, feel free to >> create >> > a new RFC. >> > >> > >> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/splweaktypehintingwithautoboxing >> Sorry for my poor english grammar, feel free to correct/expand/challenge >> it. >> >> Tyrael >> > >
