Maybe I view trunk in a different way than others, but I think
committing it turns it into some sort of 'status quo', and now we'd
need a good reason to change it.
I think major developments should be discussed on internals (IRC's
fine, but not enough), and should be discussed before committing to trunk.
Zeev
At 18:04 22/05/2010, Pierre Joye wrote:
hi Zeev,
It seems that there was a bit of discussions on IRC about committing
Ilia's implementation. However it is trunk, and trunk is a development
tree. That means its purpose is to develop new PHP features. But it
does not meant that these features will make it in the next releases
or if they will remain as they are now.
Cheers,
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote:
> Not sure what happened here, but scalar type hinting was still up for
> discussion as there are two conflicting RFCs.
>
> Not sure how come a version of it was committed to trunk, so it should
> definitely not be documented at this time.
>
> Zeev
>
> At 17:51 22/05/2010, Philip Olson wrote:
>
>> The documentation team is about to document a few trunk features, but
>> we're unsure about scalar type hinting. I see no final proposal
(only three
>> old RFC's) nor recent discussion here. Is the recent scalar type hinting
>> commit meant to bring discussion to the topic? Or, has this form of scalar
>> type hinting been finalized somewhere? Please advise.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Philip
>>
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
