On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Antony Dovgal <t...@daylessday.org> wrote:
> On 15.04.2010 12:54, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > Adding this to FPM won't help anyway - FPM doesn't use threads. > > > > You meant won't hurt? > > No, I mean implementing it in PECL/memtrack would be better since this way > you add it to all non-threaded SAPIs. > While adding it to FPM means that other non-threaded SAPIs will have to do > it in an other way. > > Yeah, this could be implemented there, but it seems that its not actively developed, last release 0.1 beta more than a year ago. But as you say, it would be a huge benefit, to add this feature for all non-threaded SAPI. Tyrael
