On 02.04.10 19:56, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> rasmus                                   Fri, 02 Apr 2010 17:56:37 +0000
> 
> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=297350
> 
> Log:
> Update the FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL filter to fix bug #49576

I'm referring to the following comment:

> +      * However, it is not identical.  I changed it to only consider 
> routeable
> +      * addresses as valid.  Michael's regex considers a...@b a valid address
> +      * which conflicts with section 2.3.5 of RFC 5321 which states that:

Is this actually correct behavior?  The top-level domain for the Vatican
e.g. has MX records, so at least theoretically p...@va is a valid and
routeable email address, no matter what RFC 5321 states.

$ host -t MX va
va mail is handled by 10 lists.vatican.va.
va mail is handled by 20 paul.vatican.va.
va mail is handled by 50 proxy2.urbe.it.
va mail is handled by 90 john.vatican.va.

- Martin

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to