At 22:58 23/03/2010, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 03/23/2010 11:54 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> At 22:44 23/03/2010, Jérôme Loyet wrote:
>>In fact with INI syntax, there is a serious missing cause there is no
>>include system shiped with. And with FPM as there is potentialy many
>>"vhosts", it's necessary to have an include system to feet all system
>>administrator needs.
>
> We were talking about the syntax, not actually
> using php.ini or PHP's INI subsystem. You can
> use the ini parser to implement includes without a problem.
The point is the XML syntax is already there and it's working fine, thank you.
No need to implement something on top of
something that wasn't supposed to be used this way.
Anthony,
You can't end discussions like that. The XML
syntax may be there, but the FPM extension isn't
a part of PHP, and I think what you're hearing is
that in order to make it a part of PHP, it needs
to conform to the way we do things in PHP - which
does not involve XML configuration files.
Zeev
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
