On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi <m...@mozo.jp> wrote:
> I don't totally agree with what is being said here, but I guess we > don't have to make Unicode a first-class value. Once operator > overloading is supported, Unicode strings can be represented as > objects, like Python does although I didn't have a look at past > discussion on this topic. Operators overloading, while being a cool feature, should not be associated with Unicode&related features. Or we are going to do the exact same mistakes than before, way too many changes, features, work to even get a visible deadline for the next major release. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
