On 11.03.2010, at 17:26, Jani Taskinen wrote: > On 03/11/2010 06:21 PM, Scott MacVicar wrote: >> >> On Mar 11, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Jani Taskinen wrote: >> >>> On 03/11/2010 04:41 PM, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: >>>> @jani: committing to a stable branch because you are getting a new laptop >>>> is not really a convincing argument. :) >>> >>> Losing the one with the changes in it is. Doing patches will only cause >>> endless headaches. Please move on, nothing to see here, it's all for GOOD >>> anyway, fixing bugs USED to be okay in any branch. Besides, this is not >>> end-of-world. If it is for someone, I suggest changing profession. >>> >>> I'd like to have branch for PHP_5_4, I'll also volunteer for RM on it. >>> Perhaps it makes people wanting to get movement in HEAD to actually do >>> something about it. >> >> +1 >> >> I'm all for 5.4, I have a bunch of patches against PHP_5_3 that I want to >> commit such a large integer support, I couldn't develop against HEAD since >> it's just not usable. >> >> I think we can officially call PHP6 stalled and should move forward with 5.4 >> and revisit unicode support in the future. > > > PHP_5_4 is now there. Feel free. Merging the PHP_5_3_FPM might be a good idea > too.
could you maybe use your own svn server if you want your own private php project? regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith m...@pooteeweet.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
