steve wrote:
>
> I don't think PHP has as much support as you think it does. There is
> no big supporter to fund a real development drive like that. 

I'd like to think that I've more or less worked out who supports PHP by
now. I know I don't go to many conferences but I haven't been living in
a cave these past 6 years.

> I doubt anyone does I1/D1/L2 cache profiling for PHP. 

I did a little bit of CPU cache profiling of PHP using oprofile, more
out of curiosity than anything. It was a couple of years ago now.

http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/view/Oprofile

But you don't need oprofile, you can make changes based on theory, and
then measure the execution time of the result.

> PHP doesn't ship with an optimizer, byte code cache, or JIT. 

But community members are developing those things nonetheless.
eAccelerator has an optimizer, there are several so-called byte code
caches, and Roadsend is a promising compiler project. I think you're
underestimating the PHP community.

> Rasmus had the idea that it should
> do simple things and be easy, and if you were going to do anything
> else, then you should have the money to do so. Fair enough really.
>   

Rasmus is not the whole community. Sometimes community members have
spare time or the freedom to choose what they work on. I put these ideas
out on this list in the hopes that someone might be inspired by them.
Also it's nice to get feedback in case I decide to have a go at one of
them myself.

-- Tim Starling

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to