jvlad wrote: >>> php5.3-200906221030 make produces suspecious output under FreeBSD >>> 6/amd64: >>> >>> Generating phar.php >>> Generating phar.phar >>> pear: not found >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> Pear package PHP_Archive or Archive.php class file not found. >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> This is not suspicious. It is self-explanatory, not a problem, not a >> bug. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. > > Greg, your answer is even more suspicious. If "Class file not found" is > neither a problem, nor a bug, what is it? > Why does it appear in the output? Doesn't "pear: not found" mean that make > tried to run pear in the $PATH and shell produced this error in the stderr? > Shouldn't it run $prefix/bin/pear only? What's about PHP_Archive? Shouldn't > it be there in the sources? > > In other words, I see two bugs there: > 1. PHP depends on the system-wide installed pear and tries to run it. > 2. One or many files are missed in the package producing the "Archive.php > class file not found" error.
1. you're wrong, PHP does not depend on system-wide installed pear, it will simply use it if present 2. nothing is missing. see http://pear.php.net/PHP_Archive If installed, phar.phar will function (partially) without the phar extension being present. In other words, not a problem, not a bug. Greg -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
