Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote: > Hi Greg > > 2009/3/27 Greg Beaver <g...@chiaraquartet.net>: > >> Pierre Joye wrote: >> >> >>>> - php_phar.dll present as an option in php.ini but there is no need (causes >>>> confusion) >>>> >>> Will be change when we are sure of the built type (builtin or shared) >>> >> What is the debate? Whether windows build should match unix build? >> > > The question is that, should Phar be built staticlly or shared by > default in the Windows distro, as it is right now then Phar is built > staticlly and if its kept that way then extension=php_phar.dll will be > useless in php.ini. >
Hi, My next question is why there is still debate on this question when the question was settled by the RMs on internals on Nov. 18, 2008 http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=122684228317217&w=2 This is why I am asking - am I confused about the finality of this decision? Greg -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
