shire wrote:
Dmitry Stogov wrote:
Hi,
Personally, I like the patch except for some small possible tweaks, and
I believe it can't make any harm with lazy loading disabled.
Thanks, what are the tweaks you'd like to see so I can try to include them?
I thought about different semantics for defined_function_hook and
declared_class_hook to just load all "lazy" function/classes into
regular ZE tables.
It's also possible to pass hash_values into lookup_function_hook and
lookup_class_hook to don't calculate them twice.
I'll return to you in a day or two (after playing with patch and
measuring speed difference) to be more concrete.
Thanks. Dmitry.
Could you provide some benchmark results?
I was hoping to solicit some from others on the list, but haven't seen
anything yet. My best example of gains is Facebook, I believe these
where around 20-30% decrease in CPU usage on a bare-bones page.
I did test Joomla and Zend Framework, the gains here aren't much if
anything as they seem to be use autoload for most files. (although I
would like to see what lazy method loading can do here).
I intend to benchmark wordpress as well. I'll post more benchmarks for
the above and this once I make some more tweaks that also might give us
better results. I anticipate that benchmarks are going to vary pretty
drastically depending on code structure, size, autoloading, etc.
APC patch to play with it and see advantages/disadvantages?
I've gone ahead and checked in the current code for APC, so you'll have
the necessary changes if you checkout CVS HEAD.
-shire
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
