Moriyoshi,
Well, the only thing we could do at this point is to re-tag the
release with the change delaying the release by a week. You know where
I stand on the matter of the code default value, but if there is a
consensus on internal that this change needs to happen, then this can
definitely be done. However, looking at the past discussion on
internals between Andrei and yourself I don't see anyone objecting to
the current implementation, so I see no issue with proceeding as is.
Let's reach a conclusion by end of day (EST time) so release can
either be made or delayed.
On 25-Feb-09, at 11:29 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
In addition, I didn't insist that the whole thing should be reverted.
I just argue about the default value.
Moriyoshi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi <m...@mozo.jp>
wrote:
The issue is not whether it is valid or not. Andrei's patch broke the
backwards compatibility that affects real-world applications and thus
cannot be regarded as an improvement.
Moriyoshi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky
<i...@prohost.org> wrote:
Moriyoshi,
My opinion is that the current implementation is valid, which is why
Andrei's patch was accepted in the first place.
On 25-Feb-09, at 9:34 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Ilia,
We didn't resolve the array_unique() issue yet. Please take this
into
account.
Moriyoshi
2009/2/25 Ilia Alshanetsky <il...@php.net>:
iliaa Wed Feb 25 14:56:51 2009 UTC
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_2)
/php-src configure.in NEWS
/php-src/main php_version.h
Log:
5.2.9
--
PHP CVS Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ilia Alshanetsky
Ilia Alshanetsky
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
