Dmitry,
Does it make sense to backport 42868 fix to address this issue?
On 12-Feb-09, at 3:56 PM, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
See the results of the following on 5.2.6, 5.2.9rc2 and 5.3:
php -r '$a[1e100] = 1; var_dump($a);'
5.2.6:
array(1) {
[-2147483648]=>
int(1)
}
5.2.9rc2:
array(1) {
[-1]=>
int(1)
}
5.3:
array(1) {
[2147483647]=>
int(1)
}
I doubt the result of 5.2.9rc2 is quite what we expect, and this
problem should be addressed in 5.3 with the 5.2's behavior unchanged.
Moriyoshi
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Moriyoshi Koizumi <m...@mozo.jp>
wrote:
Hey,
I guess the patch relies on the 5.3's DVAL_TO_LVAL behavior that was
changed by the fix for bug #42868, right?
If so, this patch shouldn't be MFH'ed as the #42868 patch was not
merged although I didn't remember any discussion on this.
See also: http://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=120799720922202&w=2
Regards,
Moriyoshi
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Ilia Alshanetsky
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
