IMHO listing new functions is useful - there could be a name collision with a function in users code (I know it is improbable, because the functions are named extname_funcname, but still possible)
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Steph Fox <st...@php.net> wrote: > > But this was actually an add-on after I put the initial 5.1 upgrading >> guide >> together. A 200-line document became a 500-line document overnight, and >> voila - nobody reads the thing. >> > > Actually I'm wrong - that was 5.2. The 5.1 upgrade guide appears to be > as-was. > > So again, why are we listing new extensions, functions and class constants? > > > - Steph > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Vesselin Kenashkov developer at www.webstudiobulgaria.com
