On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Brian Moon <bri...@dealnews.com> wrote:
> On 2/2/09 2:55 AM, George Antoniadis wrote: > >> While on this subject, would it be a waste of time to suggest a file >> extension or include/require parameter that would consider a whole file as >> php even if there is no starting<?php tag? >> Would save a lot of people from bothering with leading whitespaces, BOM, >> etc. >> > > See 2001: http://marc.info/?t=99986406900001&r=1&w=2 > > -- > > Brian Moon > Senior Web Engineer > ------------------------------ > When you care enough to spend the very least. > http://dealnews.com/ > Damn that thread was from the stone ages... People top posted then ha? nice :P The thread suggested an option (-p or -S) for the CLI that would not require the php files to have <? ?> tags... AFAIK this is currently not implemented and I could not see anywhere in the thread someone dismissing the concept so... What exactly happened with this? Or did I misinterpret something? Brian thanks for pointing the thread out but since you seem to be a part of this could you please tell me what was the conclusion that was reached?. :) Thanks. G.
