In that case why wasn't this pointed out last year, and I could of done
something more useful with my GSoC time last year......

On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:05:37 +0100, sean finney <sean...@debian.org> wrote:
> hi everyone,
> 
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:40:08AM -0500, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>> I think our bug current tracker is pretty good and most importantly  
>> makes it easy to report and update bugs which is conducive to more  
>> issues being reported. Often extra features of bug trackers make them  
>> overly complex to use and people just get frustrated with them and don't
> 
>> report bugs as the result.
> 
> aplogies if what comes is just a little verbose...
> 
> for those who don't have the luxury of "building from the latest CVS
> snapshot", the current tracker is sorely missing some kind of better
> integration with your version control system.
> 
> by a couple orders of magnitude the largest amount of time i spend on
> maintaining the debian php packages is the result of going on treasure
> hunts through your cvs logs and commit lists trying to find just which
> commits map to a particular (usually security vulnerability) bug, and
> then making sure that there were no regressions in the fix addressed by
> later commits.  take the last issue with the Zip::extractTo()...
> 
> while you might not consider my request important enough to address
> (i.e. "we don't support 3rd-party distros so we won't go out of our way
> on this"), this has implications for intra-project issues as well.
> 
> for example, when a bug affects multiple branches, those doing RM work
> would probably be interested in knowing that the fix was applied to each
> of the relevant branches.
> 
> while i'm sure there are more technical ways of integrating support
> for this, one very easy way is to just map CVS/svn/etc commits to bug
> reports transparently.  if a commit contains something like '#nnnn' in
> the commit message, you could have it post the commit info to the
tracker.
>  
> then a quick read of the bug report should be the only thing necessary
> to know if each of the branches have recieved a fix.  and as a side
> effect it would also solve the problem for those of us who 
> package/distribute php externally...
> 
> anyway, sorry if this is hijacking the thread just a bit, but having
> just spent a large part of my "free time" doing some of this stuff,
> i felt compelled to throw this in.
> 
> 
>       sean


-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to