Hi Marcus,
On 26 Nov 2008, at 19:45, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 8:33:59 PM, you wrote:
On 26 Nov 2008, at 18:56, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Stanislav,
why not have a secondary extension definition in ext/hash?
Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 7:06:03 PM, you wrote:
Hi!
Then again, we maintain BC aside from this single call to
determine if
the extension is loaded, so I guess yeah .. lets just remove it ..
we
are expecting people to update their code.
If we have function-level BC - why not just add stub extension with
dependency on hash.
I looked at this but php.h would want to include a mhash header file,
at least I think that's what it was from memory.
That's one solution, the other is to reqister that stub extension from
MINIT of the hash extension and be done (can all be done in hash.c).
I've committed this now.
Scott
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
