So does that mean the new NS operator is actually \\ and not \ ?

No developer is going to be relying on single \'s -- too likely to become an
error in maintenence, and too inconsistent (see strings discussion).

Jevon

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Arvids Godjuks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> This was argued for months, there was tons of emails to read and backslash
> is best for most people. PHP is dynamic language - that makes some major
> restrictions, so you just can't apply something that is already in use
> easily. That's why :: was rejected in first place. That's why . was
> rejected, other separators had other issues. Backslash is easy to see, easy
> to type (most layouts have it without Shift or something else) and clearly
> says - I'm a namespace!
> So anyway - in any language you will find something that you would't like.
> You just live with that or chouse another language. That's all.
>
> 2008/10/27 Thomas Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Lester Caine wrote:
> >
> >> The backslash is not ideal, but I think we all need to get behind it
> >> rather than complaining. The only other real alternative today is to
> shelve
> >> namespaces altogether for the next release rather than putting something
> in
> >> that is simply not practical to extend later?
> >>
> > I'd prefer to see it shelved for another release with the aim of fixing
> > whatever technical barriers made the syntax unworkable in the first
> place.
> > I'm sure you'd have plenty of volunteers.
> >
> > My personal concern is that once this goes public, we (the end users) are
> > stuck with that decision for the forseeable future.
> >
> > I think there's obviously enough unhappy campers here that this option
> > should be at least considered. Not that I'm holding my breath or
> anything.
> >
> > Everybody seems to be getting awfully emotional about this ...
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > T
> >
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to