Gregory Beaver wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
seen. Personally though I'd love to see stas' #1 get implemented and
"->" used for all functions in a namespace so..
one::step::two(); //always static method of class
one::step->two(); //always function of namespace.
But it's still ambiguous (only in a rarely though) - if an object with a
method "two" is assigned to the static variable of a class called one
then problem comes back.
First of all, this is not going to happen (voted down). Second of all
one::$step
is how static variables are accessed, not one::step. So there is no
potential for conflict.
Greg
right enough; there is no conflict *joy*; and it's not introducing any
new separator's into php, and I think it makes logical sense /ponders/
I've been flittering between java, as3 and php all week and ended up
highly confused, ditsy and using the wrong syntax everywhere - so
apologies for my ramblings!
cheers for the reply; and thanks for all you're hard work on the
namespaces; the RFC you wrote on the wiki really outlined the problem
perfectly and made it more accessible to the masses.
Many Regards
Nath
--
nathan ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
{
Senior Web Developer
php + java + flex + xmpp + xml + ecmascript
web development edinburgh | http://kraya.co.uk/
}
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
