Hi, I spent almost all day long reading your emails about ns implementation (including one 100+ thread).
There are many useless discussions to be honest, some of them almost going to personal side. I think this should be a simple thread of voting, instead of start another flame war here. For those that are considering only karma people, I help Pierre with windows website. Here are my votes: Namespace resolution issue: - explicit disambiguation with "use namespace blah::blah;" or "use class blah::blah;" __autoload calling order change: - I think a lot of people will have to adapt their implementation to not through Exception if class is not found (You can check that many tools do that). This will end up with always falling into your "autoload call escape fix" hint. So, I can live with it without troubles. You have a big one thumb up from me! Regards, On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceissues > > Read it and discuss. Let's be clear people: the technical problems in > namespaces are limited and solvable. The problems in the political > environment surrounding them may not be. Wouldn't politics be a > stupid-ass reason to remove namespaces? > > Greg > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Guilherme Blanco - Web Developer CBC - Certified Bindows Consultant Cell Phone: +55 (16) 9166-6902 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://blog.bisna.com Rio de Janeiro - RJ/Brazil -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
