Yes, it like it too. Just like an OOP should be.
Dave Ingram wrote:
however changing this at this point would be a huge security issue, so
if at all, it would need to be handled by an optional parameter that
defaults to false.
That would be unclean. If it's implemented in some way, json_encode should
look for the implementation of some interface (JSONEncodable or something)
providing encoding/decoding methods (similar to __sleep/__wakeup).
I must say that does sound like a very elegant way of doing things. Then
the default for __json_encode() would encode the public members, and
there would be no default __json_decode(), I suppose.
Dave
--
*Jarismar Chaves da Silva, M.Sc.*
*ADP**Labs** Brazil**
*+55 51 3327 1491 -- Direct
+55 51 9947 3613 -- Mobile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.adp.com
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
addressee and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient
or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your system.
