Greg Beaver wrote:
This is a bit amusing to read if one takes a step back :). You should know that there is quite a wide variety of opinions amongst internals developers about the importance of functions vs. classes. One interesting point is that none of the internals developers I know who use functions primarily seem to care about or want namespaces, so they have been almost completely silent on implementation details.
That is probably because we are all accustomed to naming our functions the way Phorum has, phorum_foo(). C developers have no issue with this. And yeah, if I step back and think about it, I really don't want them for MY functions. I want them for everyone else's functions. Because they are not good developers and name their functions poorly.
To all: your input is heard, and those who actually will do the committing are working very, very hard both on and off list to try to find a solution that will satisfy the largest number of developers.
Thank you Greg. I wish that long ago when I had karma I had kept working on the internals and kept my C skills sharp. They have atrophied
Brian Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
