2008/9/29 jvlad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > So as prevoius speaker suggested, and I personaly got to conclusion
> in
> > > > other thread that ":" is ideal. Short, isn't taken.
> > >
> > > $a = $b?A:B:C:D;
> >
> > Will _you_ write such code? No. Will anybody from this list write such
> > code?
>
> You may want to write
> $a = $b?A:B:C
> and how would php compiler resolve A:B:C?
> A:B vs C
> or A vs B:C?
>
> To me it's better to stay with ::
>
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
> We have (), so just do
$a = $b ? (A:B:C:D) : blah();
Document, that namespaced calls should be in () with ternary operator and
make it a parse error if coder forgets it. That's a good compromise and
little to pay for namespaces, and doesn't break any BC.
I think using ternary operator in such cases isn't realy wise - if () { }
else {} is far more appropriate (anyway, I'l beat my coders for such usage
of ternary operator). So as other members of this thread mentioned - would
you really write code like this:
$a = $b?A:B:C:D;
Are you?
Me 100% not.
