jvlad wrote: >> Adding support for functions, constants and even variables is actually >> quite do-able with the solution I suggested (different separator between >> namespace name and function/constant/variable name) and can be added >> easily. > >> Adding support for functions, constants and even variables is actually >> quite do-able with the solution I suggested (different separator between >> namespace name and function/constant/variable name) and can be added >> easily. > > > Greg, > > Does it mean that the namespace separator will not be (or likely not to be) > the same when you need access to namespaced classes vs namespaced functions? > What's about consistency of the design? If you can't resolve the ambiguity > or any other problems around namespaces without changing the separator, why > not to change it for classes too?
Hi, The patch I posted here: http://pear.php.net/~greg/ns.element.patch.txt does exactly what you are talking about. For some reason, some people find this too difficult to digest. I've already expressed my opinion on the matter (after all, I did spend almost a week developing the patch). Greg -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
