Steph Fox schreef:
Hi Jochem,
It seems to hav escaped everyone that Greg's latest proposal doesn't
change
the namespace seperator token, instead it comes with a new concept of
namespace
member [token].
No, that didn't escape me at all.
oh, good!
I was responding to the OP.
To be clear, I have worked with Greg. The experience left me with large
amounts of respect for his creativity and analytical abilities. They
exceed mine by a number of quadzillions.
I've been conversing with him over the last couple of weeks regarding namespaces
off-list and have every reason to second that thought.
That doesn't mean Greg's always in the right, but it does mean he's
always worth hearing. I know for sure I'm not the only person on this
list who sees him that way, and most of the others have far more
influence than I do.
which makes it all the more sad that the only person taking a real interest
in his [latest namespace] proposal is the one person who's completely
adamant that there is nothing in the current namespace implementation that
needs addressing (all issues come down to 'your using it wrong')
Next time, perhaps you and I should both let sleeping dogs lie ;)
I don't get the use of that idiom in this context. I think the 'namespace' dog
has been up and about for a while already, granted some would like to see it
put down permanently :-)
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
