I for one would prefer the << classes:
1) check current namespace 2) autoload if possible 3) fail functions: 1) check current namespace 2) check internal 3) fail >> I think this a good approach. I don't know how biased I am as I use the autoloader quite alot but it seems reasonable to me. On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > >> 1) check current namespace >> 2) autoload if possible >> 3) fail >> >> functions: >> >> 1) check current namespace >> 2) check internal >> 3) fail >> >> Load order would matter for functions, but the risk is worth the benefit. >> >> I believe the initial implementation of namespaces had this order for >> classes, so Dmitry's first patch would have the necessary changes. > > That's exactly the mode that I described as second non-contradictory mode. I > would like to know how many people here feel it is better than what we have > now. I know many people right now may not be reading the list due to the > Zend Conference so we'd have to wait some time to get a good feedback on > that. > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ > (408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
