Hi Stas, Am Mittwoch, den 13.08.2008, 11:29 -0700 schrieb Stanislav Malyshev: [...] > As for the argument "there's no namespaced code so anything goes since > we can't break any code" - it's bogus. We expect a lot of existing > code to be converted to namespaces once 5.3 is out, and we want to > make it as painless as possible. Throwing warning each time you have > include is not the way.
I totally agree with this: a lot of library I can think of uses such inline includes. Hopefully these libraries migrate to namespaces but without allowing inline includes it would be really painful. cu, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
