marius popa wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Gwynne Raskind
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At this point it's clear that moving from CVS to SVN for PHP has become a
more or less official project. As such, there is a new mailing list
isn't better to migrate to git or mercurial ?
http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/4/2/rails-is-moving-from-svn-to-git
it's faster and better on my opinion (why wasting time to convert
later from svn to git )
We have 1000+ people with commit access, many of whom are not very
technical. We need something with mature Windows tools for those folks
and something that isn't completely different to their way of working.
The git and hg integration with svn is also good so any developer who
prefers to have a local repository can very easily use either git or hg
and easily merge into the central svn repository.
We don't need to be on the bleeding edge of revision control systems.
In fact, I prefer to very much be a very very slow follower in that
particular area to make sure that all tools are extremely mature by the
time we go anywhere near them. The last thing we want to do is slow
down PHP development any further by forcing people to fight with a
bleeding edge set of tools.
When a winner eventually emerges in the de-centralized revision control
world and everyone creates tools for all the various platforms, we'll
have a look, but I predict that to be years away.
-Rasmus
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
