Pierre Joye wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Andrey Hristov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pierre Joye wrote:
I have no clue if Andrey has combined several fixes in one commit. At
this
point I have to rely on him choosing a proper granularity for a commit.
Too
large commits can always happen. You can work for a month in your local
CVS
copy and commit 100k at one - no difference.
Except that nobody does that for daily jobs and fixes.
The Zend guys are paid to develop and fix Zend.
The Oracle guys support oci8
Google gives Marcus time to do open-source work.
The company you work for supports you in your work on the PHP, because then
they get first-class PHP developer in house. So, I am quite sure people are
paid to do the work, one way or another.
That's not what I meant, by daily jobs I meant daily commits (be fix
or adding a feature).
What do you mean? That every addition should be committed daily in small
chunks? A feature is a feature, it's integral. Because CVS hinders the
easiness of work to commit several changeset from a local repository to
the main one, even just announcing the patches, without even committing
them to the main repository, shows that you will support some
distributed RCS to be used for PHP. CVS is ok for 1-2 people touching
the same code but not for cooperative development without much of
external communication.
Best,
Andrey
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
