Am 02.07.2008 um 22:00 schrieb Lukas Kahwe Smith:

1) intl extension
Last discussion ended without a decision on the class naming [10]. I specifically remember Derick taking issue with intl ext "invading" the date ext namespace. Stas however arguing that the intl ext is supposed to bring some forwards compatibility to PHP 6 and therefore naturally will need to span the namespaces of other extensions, that are planned to be expanded for PHP 6.

Well... we had some discussions on the i18n list, and everyone except Stas said we should have consistent class prefixes.

That did not stop Stas from simply rolling a final, stable 1.0.0.

Even though I and others pointed out other problems with it, where fixing them will break BC.

Very unfortunate, this...


David

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to