On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 14:08 -0500, Jeremy Privett wrote:
> Sam Barrow wrote:
> > I figured it out, the syntax is now as follows:
> >
> > function a($b, $c) returns d {
> > }
> >
> > I'll post an update soon.
> >
> >
> >
>
> That's certainly a non-intuitive syntax. How about we take a page out of
> the book of other C-style languages before trying to invent something
> else? I agree with Stas, "return" and "returns" are not part of a
> function definition.
I don't think it's non-intuitive at all, and even so, it's the most intuitive
we have. This ordering makes more sense to me at first glance (in the order I
would think about things; scope, name, arguments, return).
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
