Em Qui, 2008-04-17 às 23:14 +0200, Lars Strojny escreveu:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> first of all, thanks for your proposal. I like it.
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 17.04.2008, 11:42 -0300 schrieb Felipe Pena:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Well, thinking better about the behavior of type hinting, i decided to
> > change the proposal for strict type. I.e. don't accept numeric string
> > as an intenger, etc.
> [...]
>
> I would also like to see scalar and numeric too, but that's just for the
> record.
> For ReflectionParameter I would like to see an additional
> ReflectionParameter::isType(string $type_name) to allow constructs like
> foreach (array("string", "integer") as $type)
> if (!$reflection_param->isType($type))
> throw new Exception();
I also thought that when adding the is<type> methods! :D
> What about additions in the ReflectionMethod-class? I would say adding
> ReflectionMethod::isInt(), ...::isDouble() and isType() would be
> appropriate.
Sure, should there be! Thanks for remember me.
But i think that is<type> as name is confuse in this case.
We need a name for that.
--
Regards,
Felipe Pena.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
