Litespeed != lighttpd In any case, we've always been pretty liberal about these kind of SAPI extensions in order to ensure out-of-the-box experience for our users. Esp. as litespeed are willing to support it and we have precedence of Web servers which are far less common I really don't think there's a good reason not to include it. It won't break other SAPI extensions...
Btw, is this a multi-threaded SAPI or is it a FastCGI replacement? (i.e. multi-process). Just curious... Andi > -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre Joye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 5:09 PM > To: George Wang > Cc: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Inclusion of PHP LiteSpeed SAPI in the standard > PHP distribution? > > Hi George, > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 9:27 PM, George Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > It has been over two years since the last time we wrote to the list > to > > consider the inclusion of litespeed SAPI module in the stand PHP > > distribution. By that time, our code has been added to CVS > repository > > under /pecl/litespeed, and I have been told that "if there is enough > > independent user demand for it and we are comfortable with the > quality > > of the code, it will go in." > > I'm not a user of litespeed (lighttpd here) but it is a relatively > well known server in the "lite" category (cherokee, lighttpd & co). I > see no reason to reject it as long as they maintain it, +1 here :) > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
