Hi, On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 13:01 +0100, "Hannes Magnusson" wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Steph Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > does anyone have any objection to the proposal at > > http://wiki.php.net/rfc/peclversioning? > > The first step in fixing the core<->pecl relationship? \o/ > > Looks good. > But what about extensions that are symlinked to core? Will they need > to update their version info during core release cycles? > It obviously shouldn't have a -dev version when distributed with PHP.. > Is it up to the RM to hunt those extensions down and make sure the > version info is accurate?
Just removing the "-dev" in the version number would be wrong (as is symlinking), a Stable PHP release should include "stable" extensions. Not dev versions of the extension. So one of the ideas is to fetch the last stable extension release for a PHP release, but well, then there's the problem that everybody (people using snaps, people using CVS, ...) end up with different versions which makes QA hard. (not to mention bug hunting trouble with people using the latest release but updated a single extension, ....) johannes -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
