Hi,
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
All functions in pecl/intl should therefore be named intl_foobar()
and classes intlFooBar in theory.
Well, intl module as I mentioned is a bit different - it has
functional parts which could be in fact separate extensions, but for
practical reasons aren't. So leaving aside the collision with date,
do you think it's be ok to have msgfmt_*, numfmt_* etc. prefixes?
As long time PHP user I was very happy about the coding-standards to
prefix functions/classes with the corresponding ext-name, really.
As user (for some reasons) I prefer the prefixing with intl_.
However, as lurker, I know, my vote doesn't count ;-)
Kind Regards
Friedhelm
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
