Hello Edward,

Sunday, March 16, 2008, 11:04:56 PM, you wrote:

> Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> Of course it affects that kind of tools. But the scanner was changed a lot
>> of times for 5.3 already, so you have to do that anyway. That is the cost
>> of making progress - changes.

> Agreed; I'm in favor of changes. But to make things as painless as
> possible those changes should be well-documented.

Yeah, thats right. That is also the reason why we spent several weeks
working on thjise with a small team prior to comitting the work. Also
note that plans for this move are in place for over two years now. And
of course we document changes as we find them, though none of the above
looks like it needs to be mentioned anywhere.

> For me, the Windows build is currently broken; it looks like nmake is
> still trying to use flex to generate the parser code (i.e. the Windows
> build scripts weren't updated). Wondering if I should punt to Elizabeth.

Yeah kick her! :-) I've updated one of the scripts now and we will comitt
the others soon as we find them. If you know of anything we seem to have
overlooked let us know. And if you stumble about changes you think need
documentation, then *please* let us know.

Best regards,
 Marcus


-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to